Corporate bond yields depend on the company. A steady staple company like Kimberly-Clark or Proctor & Gamble with its steady income would be a better risk than a tech company who's market share can crash with the next tech innovation.
Technical FACT=OUR FED US Central Bank is insolvent (operationally it can't fund Powell's paycheck) Current Deferred Asset losses are $150B!
Why do High Yield borrowing rates compared to technically bankrupt FED US Treasuries remain a "tight spread"? IF you can justify this complacency spread, then Higher Yield risk premia is fairly priced...good luck?
Now of you said 150 trillion, it might have alerted me that something was wrong. I think we can go on until they switch to tokens and then steal our money and assets to make themselves and their crony Wall Street wolves whole again.
Corporate bond yields depend on the company. A steady staple company like Kimberly-Clark or Proctor & Gamble with its steady income would be a better risk than a tech company who's market share can crash with the next tech innovation.
Technical FACT=OUR FED US Central Bank is insolvent (operationally it can't fund Powell's paycheck) Current Deferred Asset losses are $150B!
Why do High Yield borrowing rates compared to technically bankrupt FED US Treasuries remain a "tight spread"? IF you can justify this complacency spread, then Higher Yield risk premia is fairly priced...good luck?
Now of you said 150 trillion, it might have alerted me that something was wrong. I think we can go on until they switch to tokens and then steal our money and assets to make themselves and their crony Wall Street wolves whole again.
I'm still stacking silver. Thanks for this explanation John
Buy long dated HYG PUTS ?