Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Allan Richard Wasem's avatar

Very reminiscent of a lot of the posting that Charles Hugh Smith has been doing for the last several years. Check him out. All a result of the "stealth" inflation that has gone "unmeasured" by the fedgov's and fedres' phony price measurements for the last 40 years. One perfect example of the insanity (lunacy?) of fed "thinking" - deleting food and energy from the price indices because of their "volatility". Obviously (to anyone with half a brain) if time volatility is a statistical problem you use rolling averages to "smooth" the factor. It's things like this that lead me to the conclusion that there really is no hope left at this point (and the farce with Patel and Bongino trying to tell Maria Bartiromo that "Epstein definitely committed suicide - yep he shore did") doesn't help either. That's a REALLY BAD SIGN. As I've said - BUCKLE UP.....

Expand full comment
Bruce C.'s avatar

“Basically, this is what inflation does to our idea of an acceptable home.”

Milton Friedman may say ‘inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon,” but that statement is deceptive because it doesn’t go far enough. It makes “inflation” sound like it’s just an academic term for ‘price increases’ (or the symptom of monetary expansion), instead of the cause of civilizational breakdown. This piece illustrates just one facet of many occurring throughout society today.

J. M. Keynes said it more bluntly, “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million can diagnose.”

Hence the confusion.

To many - if not the vast majority - there is a laundry list of competing root causes of societies ills, but if Karl Marx and all the subsequent anti-capitalists and psychopathic subversives are right, unsound money is it.

Understandably, that’s not obvious, at least to me. But it seems now that many people are starting to understand that or at least sense it, hence the rise of the Bitcoin narrative and growing calls to end the Fed/central banking.

But what’s unfortunate is that not everyone is adversely effected by currency devaluation, in fact some actually benefit monetarily.

Keynes again: “By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth.”

One could argue that ‘an important part the wealth of citizens’ is spiritual and moral, not just material, and so even those who are enriched monetarily are still impoverished in other ways, hence the intellectual dishonesty and willful ignorance of many of the very wealthy, and most in power.

Given that Keynes is the godfather of modern day central banking, have the Fed’s board members never read him?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts